Intel Arc Pro B70 for local LLMs: measured results
8 results from 3 builds (one and two cards), each linked to its source.
All measured B70 results
(MTP, DFlash, DSpark and similar draft-and-verify methods give much higher tok/s on predictable text and are not comparable 1:1 with plain decode)
| Model | Build | Ran on | Quant | Engine | tok/s | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B-A4B | Single Intel Arc Pro B70 32 GB (neural.download lab) | Intel Arc Pro B70 | UD-Q8_K_XL | llama.cpp SYCL (pinned build, oneAPI 2026.0) | 122.16 | π Single-user, cache-cold decode median (lab package/repro README) |
| Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B | Single Intel Arc Pro B70 32 GB (neural.download lab) | Intel Arc Pro B70 | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp SYCL + neural.download fusion patches; author marks this headline 'pending' | 131.46 | β³ author marks pendingπ Single-user, cache-cold decode median (lab package/repro README) |
| Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | Single Intel Arc Pro B70 with vLLM XPU cookbook | Intel Arc Pro B70 | GPTQ Int4 | vLLM XPU b70 image, no MTP | 120 | context: short promptπ Greedy, one request at a time, 512-token answers (README "Numbers" table) |
| Qwen3.8 27B | Single Intel Arc Pro B70 with vLLM XPU cookbook | Intel Arc Pro B70 | GPTQ Int4 (asym) | vLLM XPU b70 image + MTP, reasoning prompt | 96 | β‘ spec-decode (MTP)context: short promptπ Greedy, one request at a time, 512-token answers (README "Numbers" table) |
| Qwen3.8 27B | Single Intel Arc Pro B70 with vLLM XPU cookbook | Intel Arc Pro B70 | GPTQ Int4 (asym) | vLLM XPU b70 image + MTP, prose prompt | 66 | β‘ spec-decode (MTP)context: short promptπ Greedy, one request at a time, 512-token answers (README "Numbers" table) |
| Qwen3.8 27B | Dual Intel Arc Pro B70 (neural.download lab) | 2x Intel Arc Pro B70 | FP8 | vLLM XPU, TP2, MTP 5 | 46.01 | β‘ spec-decode (MTP)π Lab README/scoreboard |
| Qwen3.8 27B | Single Intel Arc Pro B70 32 GB (neural.download lab) | Intel Arc Pro B70 | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp SYCL + neural.download TP1 stack, no speculation | 27.8 | π Single-user, cache-cold decode median (lab package/repro README) |
| Qwen3.8 Flash-Next | Dual Intel Arc Pro B70 (neural.download lab) | 2x Intel Arc Pro B70 | IQ3 | neural.download runtime, TP2 | 58.56 | π Lab README/scoreboardpartly in system RAM |
β³ Pending: neural.download marks this headline 'pending': speed measured, install checks not finished.
What fits in 32 GB and 64 GB
Q4_K_M weights (llama.cpp quantize table), before KV cache. One card (32 GB): Flint 40B-A2.5B β24 GB, Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B β22 GB, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B β22 GB, Gemma 4 31B β19 GB, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B β18 GB, Qwen3.6 27B β17 GB, Qwen3.8 27B β17 GB, Gemma 4 26B-A4B β15 GB, Devstral Small 2 24B β15 GB, LFM2.5 24B-A2B β15 GB. Two cards (64 GB): Kolibri-1 β48 GB, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B β45 GB, Llama 3.3 70B β43 GB.
Price
We do not track a B70 street price yet, so there is no tok/s-per-euro figure here. Compare with the Radeon AI Pro R9700 (also 32 GB) and the RTX 5090.
More: all Arc Pro B70 builds Β· best LLMs for 32 GB Β· 64 GB
FAQ
Is the Intel Arc Pro B70 good for local LLMs?
It has 32 GB per card. RigBase has 8 measured results from 3 B70 builds; the fastest single-card plain-decode result is 122.16 tok/s on Gemma 4 26B-A4B (UD-Q8_K_XL). 3 of the 8 results use speculative decoding, so compare plain with plain.
Which software runs LLMs on the Arc Pro B70?
In the builds we track: llama.cpp SYCL, neural.download runtime, vLLM XPU. Speeds differ a lot between stacks for the same model, so check the engine column.
What fits in one or two B70s?
By Q4_K_M memory math (weights only, before KV cache), one 32 GB card fits models up to about 30 GB of weights, e.g. Flint 40B-A2.5B, Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B, Gemma 4 31B; two cards (64 GB) add Kolibri-1, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B, Llama 3.3 70B.
Why is one result marked pending?
The source (neural.download) marks its Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B headline as pending: speed measured, install checks not finished. We show it with that label and leave it out of βfastestβ summaries.
Referral link: if you sign up with Google and add $10, Runpod gives you and RigBase bonus credit (terms). It never affects our data.