Builds / Nvidia RTX Spark N1X, 6,144-core Blackwell GPU (unified)
RTX Spark N1X (128 GB): Qwen3.8 Flash-Next 177B-A3B UD-IQ4_XS at 31.0 tok/s, Windows on Arm (llama-bench)
Last updated:
- GPU(s)
- Nvidia RTX Spark N1X, 6,144-core Blackwell GPU (unified)
- VRAM / unified memory (GB)
- 128
- CPU
- Nvidia RTX Spark N1X
Amazon · eBay (used) · Newegg - Motherboard
- not stated
- RAM
- 128 GB unified memory
- PSU
- not stated
- Other
- Windows ARM64, llama.cpp CUDA backend build 12024 (ddf48f85c); flash attention on, KV cache q8_0/q8_0, -ngl 999, -b 2048 -ub 512, split mode none, 5 repetitions
- Reported total cost
- not stated
- Power
- not stated
Measured speed (generation tokens/sec)
| Model | Quant | Engine | tok/s | Prompt processing (tok/s) | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Flash-Next | UD-IQ4_XS (4.25 bpw, 87.24 GiB) | llama.cpp build 12024 (CUDA, Windows ARM64) | 30.97 | 588 @ 8,192-token prompt est. TTFT @8k ≈ 13.9 s (calculated from measured prefill) | context: llama-bench tg512 at depth 0📏 llama-bench tg512 30.97 ±0.05 (tg128 30.83 ±0.32), 5 repetitions, FA on, q8_0 KV |
Prompt processing = prefill speed (how fast the prompt is read) as reported by the source, with the prompt length it was measured at; blank = the source does not report it. est. TTFT @8k is calculated from the measured prefill speed (8,192 ÷ prefill tok/s), shown only when prefill was measured on a prompt of 512+ tokens. It is not a measurement and ignores load time and caching. measured TTFT is the source's own time-to-first-token. Why prefill matters for coding assistants.
llama.cpp GitHub discussion by knmun, 1 Nov 2026. Whole 87 GiB model on the laptop chip's GPU. The laptop model is not named. pp2048 was unstable across runs (313.36 ±162.68, range 167.61-592.86), so only pp8192 is listed.
Blank fields = not stated in the source. We never estimate build data; GPU street prices above are separately sourced and dated.
Quick answers: Can RTX Spark N1X run Qwen3.8 Flash-Next?